Keywords and phrases: count data, Poisson data, underreporting, mete-analysis, bias.
Received: January 1, 2021; Accepted: January 22, 2021; Published: March 22, 2021
How to cite this article: Ryan Sides and James Stamey, Underreporting in mixed treatment comparisons meta-analysis for Poisson data, Advances and Applications in Statistics 67(2) (2021), 225-236. DOI: 10.17654/AS067020225
This Open Access Article is Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
References:
[1] S. Dias, A. J. Sutton, A. E. Ades and N. J. Welton, Evidence synthesis for decision making 2: a generalized linear modeling framework for pairwise and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, Medical Decision Making 33(5) (2013), 607-617. [2] D. C. Hoaglin, N. Hawkins, J. P. Jansen, D. A. Scott, R. Itzler, J. C. Cappelleri, C. Boersma, D. Thompson, K. M. Larholt, M. Diaz and A. Barrett, Conducting indirect-treatment-comparison and network-meta-analysis studies: report of the ISPOR task force on indirect treatment comparison good research practices: part 2, Value in Health 14(4) (2011), 429-437. [3] Q. Lian, J. S. Hodges, R. MacLehose and H. Chu, A Bayesian approach for correcting exposure misclassification in meta-analysis, Stat. Med. 38(1) (2019), 115-130. [4] S. Powers, R. Gerlach and J. Stamey, Bayesian variable selection for Poisson regression with underreported responses, Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 54(12) (2010), 3289-3299. [5] D. Stangl and D. A. Berry, eds., Meta-analysis in Medicine and Health Policy, CRC Press, 2000. [6] A. S. Whittemore and G. Gong, Poisson regression with misclassified counts: application to cervical cancer mortality rates, J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. C 40(1) (1991), 81-93.
|