Nowadays, computational study has become important for almost all researches. Mathematical tools made the work easier. In the present basic computational study, the prime objective is to observe the variations in the computational results during the multi-switching synchronization (MSS) of different orders of drive and response systems using the feedback active control (AC). For the different switches, the Lorenz hyper chaotic system (LHCS) and Lorenz chaotic system (LCS) are chosen as drive and response systems, respectively. Furthermore, the entire computational study is simulated on Matlab and Mathematica at the same values of the parameters and initial conditions so that the variations can be seen in the computational results.

chaotic systems, Matlab, Mathematica.

Received: January 12, 2023; Accepted: February 15, 2023; Published: March 13, 2023

How to cite this article: Mohammad Shahzad, Variations in the computational study using different mathematical tools, Far East Journal of Dynamical Systems 36(1) (2023), 1-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.17654/0972111823001

This Open Access Article is Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References:

[1] A. Khan and M. Shahzad, Control of chaos in Hamiltonian system of Mimas-Tethys system, The Astronomical Journal 136(5) (2008), 2201-2203.
[2] M. Shahzad, V. T. Pham, M. A. Ahmad, S. Jafari and F. Hadaeghi, Synchronization and circuit design of a chaotic system with coexisting hidden attractors, The European Physical Journal Special Topics 224(8) (2015), 1637-1652.
[3] A. Khan and M. Shahzad, Synchronization of circular restricted three body problem with Lorenz hyper chaotic system using a robust adaptive sliding mode controller, Complexity 18 (2013), 58-64.
[4] M. Pourmahmood, S. Khanmohammadi and G. Alizadeh, Synchronization of two different uncertain chaotic systems with unknown parameters using a robust adaptive sliding mode controller, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat. 16 (2011), 2853-2868.
[5] M. Shahzad, The improved results with Mathematica and Effects of external uncertainty and disturbances on synchronization using a robust adaptive sliding mode controller: a comparative study, Nonlinear Dynamics 79(3) (2015), 2037-2054.
[6] A. N. Njah, Synchronization via active control of parametrically and externally excited F6-Van der Pol and Duffing oscillators and application to secure communications, J. Vib. Cont. 17 (2011), 493-504.
[7] M. Shahzad, I. Ahmad, A. B. Saaban and A. B. Ibrahim, Improved time response of stabilization in synchronization of chaotic oscillators using Mathematica, Systems 4(2) (2016), 1-21.
[8] M. Shahzad, Reduced order synchronization: a comparison of simulation between Mathematica and Matlab, i-manager’s Journal on Mathematics 8(4) (2019), 1-9.
[9] M. Shahzad, Multi-switching synchronization of different orders: a generalization of increased/reduced order synchronization, Iran J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Sci. 44 (2020), 167-176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40995-019-00806-1.
[10] S. Gang-Quan, C. Hui and Z. Yan-Bin, A new four-dimensional hyperchaotic Lorenz system and its adaptive control, Chin. Phys. B 20(1) (2011), 010509-010517.
[11] C. Sparrow, The Lorenz Equations: Bifurcations, Chaos, and Strange Attractors, Springer, 1982.
[12] E. Lorenz, Deterministic nonperiodic flows, J. Atmos. Sci. 20 (1963), 130-141.
[13] L. Runzi, W. Yinglan and D. Shucheng, Combination synchronization of three classic chaotic systems using active backstepping design, Chaos 21(4) (2011), 043114. doi: 10.1063/1.3655366.
[14] Z. Wu and X. Fu, Combination synchronization of three different order nonlinear systems using active backstepping design, Nonlinear Dyn. 73(3) (2013), 1863-1872. doi: 10.1007/s11071-013-0909-5.
[15] A. Ucar, K. E. Lonngren and E.-W. Bai, Multi-switching synchronization of chaotic systems with active controllers, Chaos Solitons Fractals 38(1) (2008), 254-262, doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2006.11.041.